Talk:Carl Laemmle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Carl Laemmle/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

reference 2 is dead note 3 link is dead —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.19.240 (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:33, 21 May 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 10:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Carl Laemmle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commercially unsuccessful?[edit]

Dracula (1931) is described here as 'commercially unsuccessful'.

On the film's own wiki page, it says: ...Dracula proved to be a huge box office sensation. Within 48 hours of its opening at New York's Roxy Theatre, it had sold 50,000 tickets, building a momentum that culminated in a $700,000 profit, the largest of Universal's 1931 releases. Valetude (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]