Talk:Candlemas Island

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fritzmann2002 talk 18:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 09:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Candlemas Island; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • More of a comment than a review, but isn't the hook just a bit too technical? It assumes that the reader is familiar with fumarolic vents, which probably isn't true for most people. Maybe a different direction is needed here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Proposed an ALT. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess that works. I've struck the original hook. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Full review needed now that new hook has been proposed. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Good to go, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 20:28, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are there really zero CC photos of the fumaroles & other life on the island?[edit]

The article is quite devoid of the flora & fauna described by the article. This is odd. Looked over in Wikimedia, in the Categories for such photo records, and did not find any. Really unusual. If scientist and naturalists have described the flora & fauna, we'd normally expect to see photos, a few we CC licenses.

Are there really none? — N2e (talk) 04:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a very frequently visited island, so it's not surprising. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did find this blog but it seems to be cribbing images from the Internet; e.g one image is cropped from this one, so we can't trust its licences. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]