Talk:C battery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Origin of name[edit]

Is there an origin for the name "C cell"? 76.66.201.179 (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merging this article with "List of battery sizes"[edit]

I've reverted changes made by Wtshymanski, which made this page redirect to List of battery sizes, as this was done without any consultation on the talk page. However, it may make sense to merge this page into the List of battery sizes page. I have also reverted similar changes made by Wtshymanski to AAA battery, AA battery, and D battery pages. --Supergloom (talk) 10:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest, again, that this article be merged with List of battery sizes. There's nothing notable about this particular size, and the relevant information is already given in that article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose merge Extremely common battery size sufficiently notable for its own article. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • OK, why? I've tried to find sources in Google Scholar and, searching for "C Cell" Battery, and excluding patents, I see 2400 hits, none of which are about this size of flashlight battery (so far) - many of them are about biological cells, not flashlight battery sizes. Google Books, same problem, about 1800 hits on C cell battery but none of them do anything but mentin it in passing. I come up with nothing that discusses whey *this particular size of flashlight battery* is notable. No sources= no inidividual notability. All the data is in the "List of battery sizes" article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Observe that we now have to repeat the references from Battery nomenclature because we have separate articles for each size. Good thing terabytes are cheap, as is editor time. --Wtshymanski (talk) 05:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on C battery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xj416 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Xj416 (talk) 01:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]