Talk:Burin, Nablus

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

who cut down the trees?[edit]

As I wrote the first time I modified this passage, I am applying the same standard as we apply when palestinian terroists carry out terrorism but are not caught. For example, if you check out 2011 Jerusalem bus stop bombing, until september 2001 when people were arrested, it said the perpetrators were "unknown". The same standard should be used here. Red Stone Arsenal (talk) 13:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, the picture comes from a non-RS who we cannot rely on for the claim. --Shuki (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Burin![edit]

With this edit back in January 2014, User:Croatgoat introduced this Hadashot Arkheologiyot (Ha Ark) article about a place called Khirbat Burin into the article.

Now, just check the Conder and Kitchener 1882:178 -ref: it gives as grid Jn.....while *this* Burin, on p. 162 has grid MO.

Anyone can check for themselves: * SWP map XI has two different places, both named "Burin". The Ha Ark-article is about the *other* Burin (west of Tulkaram, north of Qalansuwa).

Hence the Guerin-ref (originally in Guerin#1875_Samarie_2 chapter 65, also refers to that place. (I haven´t checked Pierre Jacotin, but assume it is the same there)

One can of course also check the grid.no given in the Ha Ark-article.

Hence; I have removed the article, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 06:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Burin, Nablus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203010343/http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1917 to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1917
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203013944/http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=733 to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=733
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203005340/http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=4833 to http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=4833
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221094942/http://www.burin.org.ps/wp/ to http://www.burin.org.ps/wp/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221094942/http://www.burin.org.ps/wp/ to http://www.burin.org.ps/wp/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415105634/http://www.popularstruggle.org/category/tags/burin to http://www.popularstruggle.org/category/tags/burin

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Burin, Nablus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140224062612/http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/ocha_opt_springs_report_march_2012_english.pdf to http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/ocha_opt_springs_report_march_2012_english.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221094942/http://www.burin.org.ps/wp/ to http://www.burin.org.ps/wp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Pal.rem site's 1922 numbers....[edit]

...are totally wrong. They give only 201(!) inhabitants, Huldra (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]