Talk:Brit Air Flight 5672

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 15 January 2018 by reviewer Kees08 (talk · contribs).

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem[edit]

Regarding on the copyright issue on my article, I don't believe that I had violated the copyright (at least at the time). I didn't copyedit anything at all.. I can assure you on that. However, I should confirm that I read the report chronologically, analysed it, and then concluded it in a short conclusion text. So, i can tell the readers in chronological order.

I analysed that report for hours, read it repeatedly and later concluded it. I published that article after several long days. Had I copyedited, I should've did it in a day or maybe even in hours.

Sadly, it is pretty similar to the report (I can't find a way to differentiate it even more since my English is bad). So, the way I explained the accident was controversial. That's the truth.

I do believe that this is also the best way to explain the cause of the crash or the accident chronologically. I'm an aviation enthusiast and from what I saw from the other articles, they also explain it chronologically and sometimes it bear similarity to the factual report.

So please, give me another chance to see it. Tell me where I did wrong (which parts that were suspected of copyedit) I can assure you that I'll fix it in less than a week.PaPa PaPaRoony

PaPa PaPaRoony, I'm not sure that I follow all you are saying here. However, one thing is certain: the similarity between your text and the text of the report is too great. As an example, if the report reads "The aircraft passed above the glide slope and the pilot selected the VS mode to recapture the slope. The crew’s attention was focussed on managing the flight path in the vertical plane", then you cannot write in Wikipedia "The aircraft passed above the glide slope and the pilot selected the VS mode to recapture the slope. The crew’s attention was focused on managing the flight path in the vertical plane". That is considered WP:copyright violation. Everything you write in Wikipedia must be in your own words. If you don't think your English is good enough to do that here, you you should consider contributing to the Wikipedia in your own language instead.

If you would like to re-write the article, you can do so on this page]. Please do not copy any text from the report there, as that would make the re-write useless. Please let me know, here on this page, if you plan to do that in the next few days – otherwise I will have to reduce the article very substantially. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JustlettersandnumbersAh thank you so much.. I'll do my best to improve it.. work will start in several days PaPa PaPaRoony

Please comment on Talk:Air France Flight 5672/Temp[edit]

I've recently made a new temporary page. I would like an administrator to check it for me. Let me know if there are any mistakes (e.g grammar) or if you need a clarification from me (if there are contents that are suspected of being copy-edited from the original report). Thank you. PaPa PaPaRoony PaPa PaPaRoony 05:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While your version was quite good, I ended up doing further amendments and reduced the overlap even more. Sorry for the delay. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Investigation[edit]

The section on Investigation uses jargon and is not clear for a non-expert Xcia0069 (talk) 20:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There really is not much that can be done about this. It is accurate and about as clear as it can be without going into lengthy explanations of how aircraft land. It isn't jargon, you need some technical knowledge to understand it and that can't be helped.--Weasel tango (talk) 06:41, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]