Talk:Bradford Factor

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Measurement (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Bradford Factor is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ref Edit 16 Oct 2014[edit]

To be exact, the information on wikipedia was an extract from the site bradfordfactorcalculator.com. The cut and paste job was from the site as a resource, at some point someone removed that URL as the reference.

The supporting information, absence management forms and other material are not published on wikipedia. Wikipedia summarises the topic, it does not provide free strategic and operational information and management forms and tools which support the effective implementation and use of the Bradford factor. I suggest you review the resource properly and do your homework before removing useful assets which add value for individuals looking to use the Bradford Index in a practical manner in their workplaces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.57.159 (talk) 08:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Utter rubbish the Wikipedia article is sourced from citations the website is if anything just a poor crib as any person familiar with the subject can see. Move on please. Tmol42 (talk) 12:57, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Certification[edit]

I have again reverted an edit that has qualified that the BF only applies to uncertificated absenses and has also added a non encyclopaedic edit to this effect in brackets. This is incorrect as the formula to work it needs to measure all absences regardless of status. So far there has been no explanation offered so once again I have reverted and suggested editor comes her to discuss. Tmol42 (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The help message for the user in question which you have entered would be a good start for him to understand WP. As I personally feel he is not aware of the basic editing policies of WP. I had done a revert for the conversational kind of text he had put on the same page. Amit (talk) 01:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]