Talk:Bowen ratio

Use in subjects other than meteorology[edit]

I've added a wee bit more info, including some nicer equations. I'm only aware of its use in meteorology, so I'm bound to bias this stub in that direction. Anyone know of other areas in which it's used? If not, then maybe it should be merged with an article on evaporation, latent heat or turbulent energy flux. Deditos 23:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've only known it to be used in meteorology as well, but I think it can survive just fine as a stand-alone article. I've been hoping to expand this page to include some examples and/or graphs of high/low Bowen ratios, but when I'll get around to doing that, I don't know. In the meantime, I think the page is already expanded well beyond some similar stubs of scientific terms and should be kept. E WS23 | (Leave me a message!) 21:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bowen ratio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030327074553/http://www.nsdl.arm.gov:80/Library/glossary.shtml to http://www.nsdl.arm.gov/Library/glossary.shtml#bowen_ratio
Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://195.37.229.5/pub/outgoing/jwinder/BowenRatioLiterature/Lewis_BullAmeriMeteoSoc_1995.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]