Talk:Bootleggers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Should be a redirect[edit]

Regarding this version
  • Bootlegging and Bootlegger both point to the dab page Bootleg, yet this page, Bootleggers, points to a two entry dab page of its own. Doesn't make any sense to me, and a 2 entry dab page is against policy anyway. It should either be a redirect to the only article with this exact title, or it should be a redirect to Bootleg, using hatnotes to the alternate use. MickMacNee (talk) 11:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bootleggers has other uses that do not relate to Bootleg, and so should have a disambig page. I have reverted, and added a See Also for the "Bootleg" sense. Sabin4232 (talk) 21:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Do you think there might be a way to fix this, rather than unilaterally setting up a redirect? The last version I saw had three items, not two. Some vandal removed one of the items from the list before you re-added the redirect. Would it not be more appropriate to first attempt to add content to the DAB page, rather than deleting everything for a redirect? Last I checked, adding useful content is preferable to removing useful content. Thanks. Sabin4232 (talk) 23:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        • You would have to ask at the disambiguation project. I don't think even the example above is a legal dab page, as it only has one direct blue link the same or similar to the search term, the other two being merely loosely related as a synonym, and non notable web address. MickMacNee (talk) 03:14, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
          • I'll take that as an unwavering unjustified "No". Thanks for your time. Sabin4232 (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]