This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bobcat Goldthwait article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Bobcat Goldthwait was featured in a WikiWorld cartoon. Click the image to the right for full size version.
Recent rewording without explanation does not improve article[edit]
I must revert a recent edit by 73.25.62.240 that has been marked for review and for likely having problems, as it unnecessarily rephrases what was previously more succinct and does not appear to provide any clarification or noted improvement. I should note that this user makes a lot of edits of this nature with no explanation, some of which add extra unnecessary commentary, and frequently from a mobile device in a manner indicating a lack of carefulness and contemplation. Not that I have anything against mobile devices, but it really looks like they are a little too quick on the draw. If anyone feels otherwise, please let me know, because you can always change my mind with solid arguments and evidence. Ender and Peter 16:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
