Talk:Blow lugworm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikified[edit]

Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 20:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay for flying saucers![edit]

Can anybody identify the stereotypical UFO/flying saucer.like object in the upper right hand corner of the picture on this page? Download image in highest resolution and zoom for better effect. It looks rather peculiar.I don't own any image enhancement software, but it would be awesome if someone that had could take a look. 87.56.199.161 22:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC) (User account Bobber0001, soo lazy to log on :) )[reply]

I am still curious about the object in the upper-right corner. I dropped a few lines at the discussion page of the image, I hope someone sees this or that. Bobber0001 (talk) 09:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I took the picture (the original one with all the worm casts). That was a seagull, sorry to disappoint! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.68.19 (talk) 00:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Davison (1891) has a lot of info which can be added to this page about sediment disturbances. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.195.124.145 (talk) 23:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hermaphrodite[edit]

Arenicola is not hermaphroditic as the lead says. I haven't been able to read the reference: you have to pay; but I doubt it states that, and another references (and THIS article) say the contrary. It is a species with males (with testes only) and females (with ovaries only), which is usual in polychaetes. I will delete that sentence in a few days. Also, the information about reproduction should be checked (masses of eggs, larvae developement...).--Miguelferig (talk) 20:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Hermaphroditic" sentence deleted.--Miguelferig (talk) 12:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]