Talk:Bioelectromagnetic

Anyone involved in this field, please contribute. I am only an 'enthusiast'. DSBookvideo 15:58, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All I changed is some formatting. I agree that it could still use significant cleanup and verification as the field (at least debatably) borders on the pseudoscientific realm. 16:46, 26 March 2006 (UTC)nimur User:nimur

Also, wondering if this subject is more accurately described in Action Potential, where a scientific, physiological, and procedural description of biochemical electric processes are used by the cell. Nimur 16:49, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really working here, but uhh... this looks like a load of quotes and opinions about the subject, and not very much factual information. As a scientist who works closely in the field of biomedical electronics, I am not really very satisfied with anything that this article brings to the subject of Bioelectromagnetic - especially its misleading title. The article is neither factual nor informative. (Sorry to be so blunt). I recommend this article for deletion... Nimur 17:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Chi to be very real, the life force within. I believe this article would limit Chi, would cause confusion. I recommend this article for deletion. Bruce March 26, 2006

.... Yah, what you said. But really, why is this article even here? If there is a valid contribution to this subject, an article exists at Bioelectromagnetism - as well as Bioelectricity - and even these articles may need further scrutiny.