Talk:Bijapur

Untitled

i have tried to modify the article....Please comment --Aravind Parvatikar 08:33, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Kannada Text Compatability

I converted the text Vijapur in kannada with the help of Kannada Unitext Convertor. If I view the page in Internet Explorer it is being shown properly, but same is not the case with Firefox. The one in with the tag Internet Explorer is correct--Aravind Parvatikar 13:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Review

1. The lead is too short. It should be a summary of the entire article. Approx 250-300 words
2. The article consists of topics containg information related to both the city and district. According to the Indian district conventions, this article should contain only city-related information. Bijapur district should contain the district related information. Please split. (See Mysore, Mysore district and Mysore division.
3. The history is too short. At least six paragraphs are required.
4. =Geography= should follow history.

The article should be cleaved before I can review further. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Notice

Note: I have removed the redirect from Bijapur District to Bijapur. Since both of them led to confusion.

I will be editing them to bring in clarity between Bijapur and Bijapur District

--Aravind Parvatikar 06:30, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Requested move 18 October 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

---

Bijapur → Vijapura – Govt. of India on 17-Oct-2014 cleared renaming 12 cities and towns of the Karnataka state, eight years after receiving a proposal from Karnataka government, Bijapur as Vijapura. varma (talk) 11:20, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Oppose WP:COMMONNAME. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 19:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• "Vijapura" is actually used fairly often, unlike some of these new official names, and it is not newly invented. However, the nominator ought to discuss which name is commonly used, so I'm inclined to oppose… —innotata 22:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

- varma (talk) 11:20, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

References

RFC on recent renaming of 11 Indian cities... use old or new names?

Discussion can be found here. Bgwhite (talk) 08:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bijapur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080620154843/http://www.deccanherald.com:80/Content/Jun172008/spectrum2008061673823.asp to http://www.deccanherald.com/CONTENT/Jun172008/spectrum2008061673823.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

April 2021 - COMMONNAME

@Vinayakavm: DO not modify the WP:COMMONNAME from Bijapur to Vijayapura like you did here. See the WP:CONSENSUS here, which maintains teh name Bijapur. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Someone else did it anyways. Can anyone change it back? C1MM (talk) 15:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

@C1MM You could make a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests — DaxServer (talk to me) 16:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Putting a link to the Google ngram viewer here. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)