Talk:Bell System Practices

Telecommunications: Bell System Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Bell System task force.

Reference works (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

I removed the portion of the article that said that the ITU incorporates BSP information in many places. The ITU defines standards in a relatively generic way. While they may have standardized based on certain things that AT&T did in the past it is not by incorporating BSPs. AT&T may have had a large amount of input to the standards process but I've never personally come across anything even resembling a BSP in the many ITU documents I've read nor have I ever seen an ITU document reference a BSP directly.

If whoever added this has some examples to back up their assertion please share as I'd be interested in seeing it. sam (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bell System Practices. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121124185424/http://bellsystempractices.org/ to http://bellsystempractices.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. ^{[verification needed]}

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]