This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Since the sources state that the battle ended with a ceasefire, the result should state indecisive, since neither side was a victor in the engagement per the sources.XavierGreen (talk) 23:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why? The result was a ceasefire. That's an adequate descriptor for an infobox, and per sources. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A ceasefire is not a result, it doesn't indicate anything about who was the victor which is what the result section of the infobox is for. For example, World War One ended in a ceasefire, but the Allies clearly won WWI.XavierGreen (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A ceasefire is a result if the sources tell us so. Do you have some sort of tally as to who would have won had the ceasefire not crashed the party? We're not talking about the entire war, we're talking about one battle with an outcome: ceasefire. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What could have been is irrelevant. Since the fighting is over and neither side won, the result is indecisive.XavierGreen (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Iryna Harpy is right. We write per the sources, and sources say ceasefire, not indecisive. EkoGraf (talk) 00:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
