Talk:Battle of Rancagua

Chile Low‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / South America / Spanish

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	South American military history task force
	Spanish military history task force

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dnaugle21. Peer reviewers: Bvesper, Chris.fried96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas for improvements[edit]

Here

The wording in the article could be changed to flow better at points. For example the first two sentences in the background section start off the same way. Try wording one or both differently so that it does not feel like the two sentences are structured the same. Generally I suggest not to reuse the same wording and sentence structure between sentences that closely follow each other. Avoiding this makes the article more interesting to read and makes it feel less repetitive. A couple of minor grammar fixes: in the second sentence of the battle section it looks like it should say "The Chilean forces that had occupied the town..." The sixth sentence in that paragraph you should remove the "had" so that it reads, "... the Chilean forces requested reinforcements..." Otherwise the article looks good. The links all work and the sources seem neutral and academic. Bvesper (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]