Talk:Barber and Calverley

This page was proposed for deletion by Firsfron (talk · contribs) on 20 January 2010 with the comment:
unsourced biography of a living person which has remained unsourced for years
It was contested by Bilby (talk · contribs) on 2010-01-20 with the comment:
de-prod, not a BLP

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removal of prod[edit]

I've removed the prod as both individuals have passed away, so this isn't a BLP any more. Thus the cited reason no longer applies. - Bilby (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split and rename[edit]

I'm not sure why this article encompasses two people, so I'm proposing splitting it into two separate articles per the more typical approach on the Wiki. :) I understand that they worked closely together and coauthored a great number of papers, but my feeling is that the would be better treated as separate entities. Any thoughts? - Bilby (talk) 21:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'm working on splitting this page. I'm starting with a page for TX Barber.DolyaIskrina (talk) 18:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I made a page for Theodore X. Barber. If anyone wants to do a page for Calverley let me know. Otherwise I'll get to it within a week.DolyaIskrina (talk) 07:11, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barber and Calverley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617045539/http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080322/OBITS/803220333/-1/rss13 to http://www.capecodonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080322/OBITS/803220333/-1/rss13

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to try to clean up this page[edit]

Hi, I'm a new editor, and I'd like to take a whack at cleaning up this page. I'm going to do some research to see why these two people share one page. It does make sense to me that this should be split. Please let me know if you have any info or input. I'd really appreciate it.DolyaIskrina (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to nominate this page for deletion!!!![edit]

I made a Theodore X. Barber page, and now this stub seems like it needs to go. It's sad for Calverley. If I could find wp:secondary about him I'd work on that page. If anyone has sources, please let me know. I'll nominate in a few days if I don't hear anything. DolyaIskrina (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I know its been ages, but I just saw this on the stub list. You did a beautiful job with the Barber page, so I think it is obvious you would have done this one also if there was enough to make it for Calverley also. What are your thoughts on going ahead and deleting this stub of stubs? Sgerbic (talk) 05:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]