Talk:Barbara L

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleBarbara L is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 1, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 25, 2009Good article nomineeListed
October 3, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 9, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that before the Quarter Horse Barbara L became a racehorse, she demonstrated horse trailers for her owner, a trailer salesman?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Barbara L/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article is quite good, though on this one I found a couple issues:

  • "Her total earnings on the racetrack were $32,836 ($267,806." <-- I tried fixing that but can't seem to figure out why it's showing like that.
Gary fixed it before I could, thanks Gary! Ealdgyth - Talk 14:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I assume the broodmare second paragraph all uses the same ref, hence just one at the end? (just making sure)
Yes, you are indeed correct. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Barbara L's 1968 foal did not start a race" Is there a name for the foal?
There is, but it was actually a 1969 foal (typo that I've corrected). I threw the name in, but I was trying to avoid name overload a bit. This foal didn't do anything, and I'm not sure that she ever produced anything either. Anyway, name's in there now.

I'll put it on hold then pass when it's taken care of. Wizardman 02:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I might have fixed the first point. I noticed, though, that the infobox and "Racing career" sections give the total earnings as $32,836, but the lead gives a total of $32,834. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Official record gives 32,836. So I've standardized on that. (I suspect the 834 figure's from an article or something else.) Ealdgyth - Talk 14:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 22:31, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts[edit]

  • "Against some of the giants of the breed" - is this metaphoric or literal (i.e., is it that she beat the most successful horses of the day, or that she could beat larger horses)? I assume the former.
    • Reworded so it's not so colloquial. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't know if this is a standard convention, but should Lumpkin be listed as "owner" in the infobox along with Green, if he was her owner for a significant part of her career?
  • Appreciate there may not be sources for this, but do we know why Lumpkin used an expensive horse with an illustrious pedigree to demonstrate his horse trailers, when presumably any old nag could have done the job just as well?
    • No clue. My guess is she was too young to start racing yet. Maybe she was just not scared of crowds. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do we know where she came from, or is "registered as bred by James Hunt of Sonora, Texas" the closest we have?
    • That's it. Hunt bred most of his horses there in Sonora, but he bred a LOT of horses, so it's not like we can say "She foaled in Hunt's front yard" or anything like that. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do records exist for her height, speed etc?
  • Is there any horse in the entire country that isn't descended from Peter McCue? He seems to pop up every time.
    • There are some. I did a pedigree for a mare a while back that had no documented PMC blood in her. (Undocumented, I'm sure there was plenty...) Ealdgyth - Talk 14:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other than that, can't see anything glaring. – iridescent 13:49, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks muchly, I think I can turn this over to Malleus soon. Going to check with Moni also. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

Congratulations to all the contributors to this featured article. You deserve a lot of applause, recognition and appreciation. What a wonderful article.

  Bfpage |leave a message  09:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barbara L. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barbara L. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barbara L. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]