Talk:Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon

Australia: Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Baltic Shipping Company v Dillon is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Multiple issues[edit]

I have tagged the article as relying on primary sources because it consists almost entirely of 2 quotes, firstly from the trial judge and then of Mason CJ in the High Court.

Similarly the majority of references are included in the quotes & not in accordance with Wikipedia's style guide for footnotes. Find bruce (talk) 07:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]