This article was nominated for deletion on 8 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2007 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
At least one of books described seems to exist (1983)[1] - but with a different transliteration of the author's name: Baladwa Rāja Gupatā. Maybe worth AFD debate. --Mereda 08:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article is labelled as unreferenced, however the ISBN/book links can be used to verify at least the information regarding publication. I was unable to find any additional references to add. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 21:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm inclined to take it back to AFD - the last one was closed an no consensus but appeared to lean more to delete than keep. He doesn't appear to be a notable academic. What do you think?--Michig (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If someone was able to ascertain that his published works have had significant impact in academia then an argument could be made to keep. Perhaps starting an AFD would bring wider attention to the article and some sources might be found to help bolster any claim of notability. If nothing new comes to light then the article will likely be deleted, but at least we tried...--Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 15:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
