Talk:Baghdadi Jews

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iraq Low‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very confusing opening[edit]

The opening paragraph is very confusing and overly long. Does not make clear quickly the community's primary association with India and the Indian Ocean and South China Sea ports. Much of the first paragraph should be moved to create a new origins or early years section.

This has be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Nahoum (talk • contribs) 01:47, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed! I came to this article by chance, and could not understand what it was about. I'm still not sure, so I didn't try to adjust the opening. I hope someone knowledgeable about the subject could fix it up... --IamNotU (talk) 22:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The History should be divided[edit]

There is a clear case to divide the history into a pre-colonial, British colonial and post-colonila section.

This has been fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Nahoum (talk • contribs) 20:36, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking Help on References[edit]

I want to make the references look good, but when I click the edit zone they appear not to be there. Please advise! User:David Nahoum

The references are in-line with the text and start with <ref>. Please read this before you start, formatting and structuring references can be difficult. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What I want to do is edit the links in the section called references, to put them in capsule links... but when I click edit the section called "references" I cannot see them. Could you take a look at the section Velella

Sorry, "capsule links" is not a term I am familiar with. Your addition of a link which you have numbered 31 is not appropriate and is not how Wikipedia manages its references. In the reference list, the references indices are generated from the in-line references. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Velella I have now got it!

Velella What is your advice towards improving this article in general :)

Sorry, but this isn't a topic that I know anything about. In cases like this this I am simply monitoring compliance with Wikipedia standards and norms - the content passes me by ! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 08:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]