Talk:BREEAM
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Previous deletions[edit]
As far as i can tell the two times this was deleted in the past were not for reasons to do with notability or anything but the first time for "G12: Blatant copyright infringement" and the second time for "A2: Article in a foreign language which exists on another project". So this time i've hopefully avoided that with a basic 'this is what it is' article and a few references that can hopefully be built on (pun intended). Cheers. extraordinary (talk) 09:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
The list[edit]
Regardless of whether this is a "company" or an "organization", you cannot reference a long list of items to that organization's own web site. wp:n requires that references be third party and independent of the subject of the article. Right now out of 25 references, 19 are to BREEAM (18 to BREEAM.NL) itself. I'll tag it for over-use of primary sources. LaMona (talk) 13:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Purpose[edit]
Are all the various certifications rated on the scale of pass, good, very good, excellent, outstanding?
What would constitute things as being good vs very good, what are the levels of grading? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Argucb6 (talk • contribs) 03:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Cost and Benefits[edit]
There is a case study evaluating BREEAM project published by Sheffield Hallam University which may help this section out. ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Argucb6 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)