Talk:Aunt Bessie's

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aunt Bessie's article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Aunt Bessie's is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

edit
history
watch
purge

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Biased?[edit]

Under Range of Products:

"Yorkshire puddings - Irrestistable, Perfect For Chicken, Perfect for Sausage, Homebakes." Who's point of view is that? Reads like an advert! Kiltpin (talk) 15:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Promotion[edit]

This is blatantly a promotion article that needs to be redirected. This degrades Wikipedia. The parent company has some notoriety and is worthy of a encyclopedic entry. My suggestion is redirection.

The main reference that provides any shred of historical significance is now gone and I cannot find a replacement source: https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/butlins-aunt-bessie-s/story-11948230-detail/story.html

Verigio22 (talk) 02:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - One dead reference doesn't instantly make an article non-notable - there are sources that have been added that show it to be a highly ranked and recognisable UK brand. If being promotional is the problem then that is an complaint that could be made about every article that is about a business, trying to remove or rephrase the particular peacock-terms in question would be a better solution, and even a merge proposal would be better than a redirect. EdwardUK (talk) 03:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The name "Aunt Bessie's" is much more familiar, and therefore more likely to be searched for, than the name of the parent company, so if ever there was consensus for this article to be merged then the original page name would need be retained either as a redirect or possibly a disambiguation page. Then if an article were to be created about another subject of the same name then this would use a different title, for example: "Aunt Bessie's (CKF Foods)", and a hatnote could be used to distinguish between the two articles. EdwardUK (talk) 17:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]