Talk:Artist's Studio—Look Mickey/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

• Lead is a bit short.
  • Expanded.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• Details --> Description
  • O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• "For someone familiar with the artist's oeuvre, the Studios could become mental playgrounds." --> Who said that?
  • Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
• Critical commentary --> This really isn't enough for its own section.
  • I have added some more. I know the section is still small, but I think it is proper to format a work with this type of section if we can source a few comments, like we have.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

• Yes, it is fine now. Statυs (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

• Everything else looks good. Well referenced and written.

• All issues have been addressed. Passing the article! Great work! Statυs (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

drive by comment

• I think given the excessive quotes in the footnotes copyvio should be addressed. MathewTownsend (talk) 17:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)