This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Section about foreign policy is highly biased[edit]
The section about foreign policy doesn't summarise Laschet's views, rather it is merely a summary of Noah Barkin's criticisms about Laschet's views. This isn't helped by the fact that Noah Barkin is a fellow of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, a think-tank that examines foreign policy on the basis of an extremely US-centric perspective.
In the interest of neutrality, I think it would be best to re-write it in a more objective tone. If criticism is to be named, it should be criticism that is of a high relevance within the German political system -- for example, what do other German parties or politicians criticise in the context of the Bundestagswahl 2021. There are so many think-tanks in the world that no matter what position a politician holds, you will always find some commentator criticising it.
Sarrotrkux (talk) 22:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
