The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about personal opinions. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about personal opinions at the Reference desk.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Material from Anti-abortion violence was split to Pro-abortion violence on 2009-06-01. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
@Sijambo these are the only edits by the ip and account. Doug Wellertalk 10:56, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Try Conservapedia. "pro-abortion" isn't a thing. Jibal (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pro abortion is certainly a thing. It's supporting the ability to terminate a pregnancy and end a human life. 107.190.100.141 (talk) 02:48, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pro abortion rights is a thing, and it's not the same as pro abortion. Even those who support that right don't love the idea of abortion. They support that right as a sometimes necessary evil. So be careful not to confuse the two. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 04:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Does not preclude a new section or article being written about what the nominator wants, just that the idea to convert this specific article from one scope to another is not having any traction. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 16:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anti-abortion violence → Abortion and violence – Expand topical scope to include all abortion-related violence. Current title refers to motivation rather than targets. A generalized title enables us to document abortion-related violence regardless of specific motives, targets, or ideology. Conforms with title format of existing articles, Abortion and mental health, as well as numerous "X and violence" topics. Elizium23 (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Abortion and violence" would be a title for a different article, with a much wider scope than this. Anti-abortion violence would be part of it, but...it is a notable topic on its own, and warrants a separate article. I'm not sure this request falls within the scope of RM. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️🌈) 02:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Vermont. There's no reason to move this and allow scope creep, when one could create Abortion and violence as a standalone article in its own right. This move also seems at odds with Draft:Pro-abortion rights violence, which I can see Elizium23 is also contributing to, as if this article had its scope widened it would also encompass that draft's content. Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Specifically states "Anti-abortion violence is violence committed against individuals and organizations that perform abortions or provide abortion counseling." No need to change the scope. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Substantial coverage in reliable sources that anti-abortion violence is a significant topic in its own right, with most coverage and sources focusing on this aspect. The motive is part of the the topic, whereas the proposed alternative would be a vague WP:SYNTHy mishmash that mostly fails to reflect the sources. --Aquillion (talk) 18:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.svg){kind=small}
