Procedural close, January 6, 2005, see discussion.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe Organ, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pipe Organ on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pipe OrganWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe OrganTemplate:WikiProject Pipe OrganPipe organ articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Both previous AfDs have been about different people and neither about the current article subject. VelellaVelella Talk 09:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Recent edits suggest that the editor claiming to be the subject of the article may be in contact with other editors who have added content to the article, since the edit request was submitted the very same day that edits were made to the article which added promotional information and which refer to the subject using a familiar tone (by using the subject's first name).
Hello, this page is about me, so I have a COI and am therefore not able to edit it myself.
However, the flag placed this week by Melcous doesn't have any supporting information; I am not sure how I should go about disputing this accusation but hope a more experienced Wikipedian can help! I have no connection to the (now deleted) user who made this page (and lives on the other side of the world) so don't feel it's appropriate that this flag has been placed without being explained.
Thanks,
Andrew
Pianody (talk) 18:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Melcous:, as the editor who added the {{Undisclosed paid}} tag, would you mind explaining what lead you to believe this article may have been created by a paid editor? I do see that FinalFrontier.003 was a paid editor, but this article is not on the list that was on his userpage at one time. I also see that FinalFrontier.003 has been blocked for sockpuppetry, and that there were concerns about undisclosed paid editing. That said, this article doesn't seem promotional or in need of clean up. What are your specific concerns here? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 19:30, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If it wasn't FinalFrontier who spurred Melcous' suspicion of UPE, I'd venture that BroomWhisk's edits eventually would. A 3-hour-old account suddenly adding information to an obscure article using the personal tone of a first-name basis — ("In October 2014, Andrew was appointed as Director of Music of Glasgow Cathedral") — I've seen plenty of articles edited by associates of subjects who add information which refers to those subjects using their first name. Those circumstances are naturally suspicious. Spintendo 20:10, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the tag was originally added as part of a large group of articles written by a group of editors who have been banned for sock puppetry and undisclosed paid editing. My initial purpose was to flag it as part of that group, and if other independent editors later checked the article thoroughly and were happy that the content was not compromised, it could and would be removed. I take Spintendo's point however that there are probably conflict of interest questions about the recent editing too. Melcous (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Melcous:, @Spintendo: and @ONUnicorn:, thanks for your responses (and sorry not to get back to you sooner). I understand Melcous's reason for adding the flag, but had been wondering if it's possible for someone to either resolve/remove those conflicting edits (or the entire page itself) rather than the flag remaining forever? Thanks, Pianody (talk) 15:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
