Talk:Andrea del Sarto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

The following text has been deleted: Piero retained Andrea for some years, allowing him to study from the famous cartoons of Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo. Is this information incorrect? --Wetman 18:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • No idea. Don't have access right now to any of the sources I would check (at my public library :) Wikibofh 16:52, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, I'm quite certain that it was deleted by someone for whom the word "cartoons" and the names Leonardo and Michelangelo, when taken together, add up to Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles— thus concluding that the statement was a hoax! I can't begin to tell you.... But no laughing permitted at Wikipedia! I wonder whether the Deleter will have the strength of character quietly to return the sentence to the article. We shall see. --Wetman 23:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

on Cartoons[edit]

I may have deleted it based on SJ. Freedberg's text. In addition, the 1911 Britannica entries, on which the shell of this entry is based, is full of these statements. Apprenticeship in Sarto's time was not a time passed "studying drawings". Sarto almost certainly was able at some point in his life see the competing fresco cartoons (now lost) of Leonardo or Michelangelo for the Palazzo Vecchio, but he was also able to see many other works in Florence. Why single these out?

The 1911 Britannica makes it sound that all any artist in Rome or Florence ever learned, he learned it either from Leonardo, Michelangelo, or Raphael. A tad of the Stendhal Syndrome focused on these artists. I vote for making the Art entries factual, relevant, and meaty. I do not think the entry above qualifies. CARAVAGGISTI

Death date[edit]

Many sites say he died 28 September 1530, one even specifying it was a Sunday - [1]. -- JackofOz (talk) 13:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, there are more google hits for 28/29 September 1530 than for any date in January 1531. I'm making a change to the article. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 04:29, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self-portraits[edit]

I've corrected the claim that the National Gallery portrait is a self-portrait, presumably left over from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica. There are other paintings around formerly considered to be self-portraits. I can't find anything out about the painting mentioned at Alnwick Castle. The one in the Uffizi seems to be still considered genuine. Is there anyone more knowledgeable? Gwedhi (talk) 22:44, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Andrea del Sarto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrea del Sarto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]