Talk:Ancient Greek calendars

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Georgina Hutchison. Peer reviewers: Sdavaiga.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

The year on Delos and in Boiotia, one for a long time Athens' subject and the other always Athens' neighbour, began midwinter and not midsummer, just like the modern calendar, so the opening sentence of entry needs adjusting. (sources given in Richard Hannah, Greek & Roman calendars, P73) Flounderer 12:08, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The calendars of cities of Phokis, Delphi aside, also started in midwinter. The Spartan and Macedonian months started with the autumnal equinox. Catherine Trumpy's recent book on Greek months also contradicts this entry. The description of heliacal rising is incorrect, as the wikipedia entry shows. When you take out the midsummer start for all calendars then the follow-up on Minoan influence is clearly unsustainable, so a re-write from scratch may be necessary.
I'd be willing to re-write some of this, but it's difficult to write a generic hellenic calendar entry, particularly when compared to the Attic calendar entry. Perhaps a brief entry on the lunar nature of the calendar ref Aristophanes, the problems of intercalation ref Herodotus and Geminus and on parapegmata with links to other entries would be better. Realistically whatever I write will need addition, which I suppose is what wikipedia's about.
Robert Hannah's book is very good isn't it? --Alunsalt 21:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from this issues of correctness pointed out above, some of this is incomprehensible and requires a retelling of the story to make it more logically palatable... Stevenmitchell 01:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A truly awful paragraph, one for the AGES. Somebody PLEASE put it out if its MISERY![edit]

This article on the Hellenic calendars is so badly written, it literally makes my TEETH HURT. Let's give these "sentences" (term loosely used) a go, shall we? --

The month in which the year began, as well as the names of the months, differed in the dif­ferent countries of Greece, and in some parts even no names existed for the months, they being dis­tinguished only numerically, as the first, second, third, fourth month, &c. In order, therefore, to acquire any satisfactory knowledge of the Greek calendar, the different states must be considered separately.

"In some parts even no names existed"...evil portent of muck to follow.

"Differed in the different countries??" ...jeez louISE...let's see -- were the folks living there DIFFIDENT? Or is that too DIFFICULT to work out..?? Lord.

"...no names existed for months, they being distinguised..." OUCH!! PLEASE GOD, STOP NOW...you just broke about 18 different rules of style, grammar and syntax in ONE FREAKING SENTENCE. STOP IT!!

Ah, Wikipedia. Where anybody can write authoritatively on anything!! Ain't it great? Now, where's that shortcut for Encarta hiding? (I disown and of course have no knowledge of ANY style or grammar errors in my OWN comments, of course! ;-)...or would that be "grammatical" errors...? hmmmmm...too many ellipses...

69.118.234.2 (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text was from Smith, Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities (right at the top of page 223) [1] 62.1.165.96 (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's not grammatically wrong but, in his defense, it is awkward as hell and would have been seen as such even by 19th century standards. Still, who can really hate a good &c. when it shows up in the wild? — LlywelynII 01:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?[edit]

I think that "Phliastos" in the Laconian system should probably be Phliasios or Fliasios. I am no expert, and am therefore unwilling to change this in the article. But I do think it's wrong as it stands. Mjhrynick (talk) 01:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hellenic calendars[edit]

The article's former name notwithstanding, it has nothing to do with the post-Alexandrian Hellenic world and is focused on ancient Greece. Pending very good sources to the contrary, I don't think we should even mention the former name on this page. It should be rebuilt into a dab for all the Hellenic calendars, including Egypt, Syria, Macedonia, and Persia. — LlywelynII 23:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Hellenic" is another word for saying "Greek". I do not see your point. And what Egypt, Syria and Persia have to do with Greek calendars? NickTheRipper (talk) 21:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps Llywelyn is confusing the word "Hellenic" with "Hellenistic." Piledhighandeep (talk) 04:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ancient Greek calendars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]