Talk:An Appeal for Human Rights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on An Appeal for Human Rights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Aoidh (talk). Self-nominated at 02:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article has indeed been expanded 5x. DYK done, hook verifiable and interesting, no copyvio detected. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 08:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. I know it's good, but I forgot to comment on Earwig's results which I want to comment on just in case someone else notices the match. Earwig says that this page matches some text in the article. On archive.org that site has no versions older than May 2020, the filenames on the site are also dated 2020, and the whois for the site says it was registered in 2020. The matching text has been in the article since 2010. Given that the text is about a decade older than that website, it seems to be a situation where the website is copying Wikipedia, rather than the other way around. - Aoidh (talk) 08:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]