Talk:Amsterdam Impressionism

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

"The innovative ideas about painting of the French impressionists were introduced into the Netherlands by the artists of the Hague School"[edit]

"The innovative ideas about painting of the French impressionists were introduced into the Netherlands by the artists of the Hague School" ...

This is just plain wrong I'm afraid and I've scratched it. I've also scratched an obscure uncited remark about the paintings of Claude Monet and a rather inconsequential comment about Amsterdam as a centre of artistic life.

In their place I've provided a translation of the Dutch page, but it's not a long article and I don't have any particular expertise in the movement. RobvanderWaal (talk) 02:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Curiously I've found a quote from the Rijskmuseum of all places which asserts exacly this and in the spirit of Wikipedia verifiability I've reintroduced it (but originally it was an uncited copy vio), citing the source and removing the refimprove template as the article is now adequately cited, for what it's worth. It's still plain wrong, however. Breitner may have brought the spirit of French impressionism back with him, but he was never really a painter of the Hague School in the first place. As for the rest of them they were far too content with their little niche of Dutch realism, which brought in solid pennies and real fortunes, the London and New York offices of Goupil stacked to overflowing with their work, to be bothered with revolutionary French art movements.

On second thoughts I've just cited the source without comment. Let someone else add it in if moved to do so. I rather suspect "Amsterdam Impressionism" is essentially an invention of someone in the Dutch Tourist Office :). RobvanderWaal (talk) 13:57, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amsterdam Impressionism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206212120/http://www.kb.nl/dossiers/breitner/index.html to http://www.kb.nl/dossiers/breitner/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]