Talk:Allied leaders of World War II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Some questions.

Shouldn't we find a better way to give highest rank of military leaders. In some cases highest rank is now given side by side with some command at an earlier time.

Also isn't this article a duplicate of an already existing article. I can't seem to find it right now but I recall a similar article somewhere.--Caranorn 23:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok the article I thought this might be duplicating is Commanders of World War II. But that one treats commanders from both sides. Though maybe some kind of merger should be considered (including Axis Leaders of World War II). Maybe copy Commanders of WW II's history into both new articles and then split the content. It definitely looks like duplication right now.--Caranorn 23:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was never familiar with that article. Before I wrote this I did a search for it and nothing came up. Unlike the Commanders of World War II I wanted this article to focus on both the military and political leaders of WWII. – RedNeck 9:27, 14 March 2007 (PT)

Merger[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The result was merge. -- Oshah 15:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I move this article be merged with World War II Allied Leaders. Discuss. VolatileChemical 08:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Pure duplicate, and the other article has exactly the same title as this one (save for a minor difference in phrasing). Since this article is more advanced than World War II Allied Leaders (which hasn't really passed through stub phase), I propose we merge into this article --84.65.21.206 17:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was New Zealand so unimportant to the war as to warrant being completely removed from this article? Can we put New Zealand back? And what about Sir Claude Auchinleck? Wasn't he commander-in-chief of the Indian Army? Why is Mahatma Ghandi the only person worthy of being listed under Indian leaders? --Farkas János

I put in leaders of WWII from New Zealand. -RedNeckIQ55

Support. I also agree that New Zealand should be added as they were involved in the conflict, though not majorly. I believe that all leaders of all countries that fought the Axis powers, no matter how limited the role may have been. Also, Mahatma Ghandi is not the only important Indian leader, as Farkas just pointed out.

Merged. This discussion has gone on long enough. -- Oshah 15:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New Change to British Commonwealth[edit]

After User:Grant65 brought up an issue I decided to place the leaders of British Raj, Malaya, and Palestine under the United Kingdom since they were still territory of the UK smiler to Puerto Rico being territory of the US. - Mr.NorCal55 (talk) 21:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is reasonable.
I still have my doubts about including "leaders" of colonies under direct foreign control (e.g. Malaya, Newfoundland, Palestine, Puerto Rico). Are we going to include the (literally) hundreds of colonial officials who presided over the various territories controlled by colonial powers, from Greenland to New Guinea? Grant | Talk 03:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not all, just the ones that were involved in the war. Mr.NorCal55 (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Almost all of them were involved. Grant | Talk 04:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Grant - leaders of colonies should not be included. India is a special case, because India was considered an allied power in its own right - it had been a member of the League of Nations, signed the Declaration of United Nations as a full signatory like the dominions, and so forth. The rest should be avoided, and even India is rather tricky. john k (talk) 22:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not leaders[edit]

I don't think that some of the people listed here, especially in the Peurto Rico section, are important enough to be listed as leaders. Individual ship or regiment commanders did not decide the course of the war, so should be removed from this page.--92.9.178.90 (talk) 12:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Unless anyone has any objections I will remove them in a few days. --QueenCake (talk) 14:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Removed people from the Peurto Rico section I didnt think should be mentioned as leaders. QueenCake (talk) 17:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why no George VI?[edit]

Surely George VI counts as an allied leader being Head of the British State and Leader of the Commonwealth? 2.97.172.114 (talk) 13:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United Mexican States?[edit]

I'm wondering if this violates WP:ID. I've left it for now, but "Mexico" is so much more a familiar term for English readers than "United Mexican States" that I am inclined to think it should be reverted. --Yaush (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Allied leaders of World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Allied leaders of World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Allied leaders of World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Allied leaders of World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:52, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the leaders in the Potsdam, the us president is wrong and says U.S. President Jonathan “Teedy” Baines; link below[edit]

Allied_leaders_of_World_War_II#/media/File:Potsdam_conference_1945-8.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrackers (talk • contribs) 23:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Allied_leaders_of_World_War_II&oldid=1204736958"