This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on November 4, 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Same guy? Some source issue and maybe improvement needed[edit]
"... and Lawrence.com's Kevin McDonough referenced All Souls as "a classic Aaron Spelling production" primarily due to its editing and special effects. The Charleston Daily Mail's Kevin McDonough wrote that All Souls was "the best show you never watched". Same with both sources, same guy or just a coincidence?
It is mostly likely the same person as Kevin McDonough seems like a rather prominent television critic. I have modified the text to better reflect this. Aoba47 (talk) 01:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note 20 & 21 show exactly the same urls, 2001/08/31, I presume latter should be 2001/09/07?
I have removed those sources. I have explained why in the response to your third point. Aoba47 (talk) 01:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Only pilot have viewers number 2.1 million, but I can locate numbers of 2nd episode, 3rd, 4th, 5th & 6th, why not included?--Jarodalien (talk) 11:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I had originally included these sites in the article, but I had later removed them as I could not find strong enough evidence to support that they are reliable sources. While this information should ideally be a part of the article, I believe it should be from a higher-quality source. That is why the pilot ratings are the only ones included in the article since it comes from a high-quality source (the Chicago Tribune).
I had thought I deleted all of the TV Tango sources in my past edits, but I had missed the two that you have pointed out above. Apologies for that, and thank you for the messages. Let me know if there are any further questions about the article and apologies for the delay in my responses. Aoba47 (talk) 01:51, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
