Talk:Alexander of Jerusalem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alexander of Jerusalem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alexander of Jerusalem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Origen's Letter to Alexander of Jerusalem[edit]

The fragment of the Origen's Letter to Alexander of Jerusalem, as described by the EUsebiusEcclesiastic History (VI 19, 12-4) "narrates that he frequented for a while a philosophical school, meeting there Heraclas, who subsequently would become his assistant at the didaskaleion and later on, as bishop of Alexandria, his staunch enemy." He also names Pantaenus as the model for his own behaviour, without any form of concern to his nearer predecessor, Clement of Alexandria.

I think that Letter must be cited since it ignored the man who was probably one of the main moral models of Alexander of Jerusalem,Clement of Alexandria. While Alban Butler says that Origen and Alexander had studied together in the great Christian school of Alexandria, one of the fewest and very rare autobiographical texts we have about Origen mentions uniquely a not well known Heraclas as his companion of studies and Pantaenus "as the model for his own behaviour". For thise reasons, I think the paper commenting the letter has to be integrated into the article.

The related source is given by academia.edu, L. Perrone Origen’s “Confessions”: Recovering the Traces of a Self-Portrait, STUDIA PATRISTICA VOL. LVI,Volume 4: Rediscovering Origen, Peeters Publishers, 2011, p. 8.

Any comment will be kindly appreciated.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 00:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]