Talk:A Book of Ryhmes

A fact from A Book of Ryhmes appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 August 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a miniature book written by a 13-year-old sold for over $1 million?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Book of Ryhmes.

Wikipedia

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal A Book of Ryhmes is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 01:39, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a miniature book written by a 13-year-old sold for $1 million? Source: "A miniature book written by novelist Charlotte Brontë when she was 13 has been bought for $1.25m (£983,500)." Charlotte Brontë's early Book of Rhymes sold for £1m, 26 April 2022, BBC News
- ALT1: ~~... that the Book of Ryhmes written by the 13-year-old Charlotte Brontë, may be the most expensive book ever sold due to its miniature size?~~ Source: "Measured by surface area, the little book of poems now back in Haworth is the most expensive book in the world." Why Charlotte Brontë's tiny £1m pamphlet proves that little things mean a lot, Louisa Young, 7 August 2022, The Guardian
- Reviewed: Regina coeli (Mozart)

Created by No Swan So Fine (talk). Self-nominated at 09:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Fascinating story and hook, in keeping with policy. This is good to go. I actually prefer the first hook over ALT1 - it's pithier and inspires the reader click into the article to learn more. Topshelver (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ALT1 is not true as written. It could be rewritten (add surface area qualifier), but the reviewer preferred the other hook, so I just struck it. MANdARAX XAЯAbИAM 16:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Post-promotion comment: the link to the BBC article that confirms the hook fact does not work but this link does. Schwede 66 02:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Authors[edit]

Unsure which way you want to go on author format in the references. Reference 3 uses last/first format, while 4 & 5 use first/last format Keith D (talk) 11:38, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]