Talk:60 Wall Street/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Shushugah (talk · contribs) 17:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Easily passes GA status[edit]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I finished reading the article carefully. The prose is extremely on point. It's grammatically correct, flows nicely and written in neutral form. I made a quick edit to fix some small typos/missing spaces and renamed one section, but otherwise it conforms with MOS:LAYOUT, quality and secondary references, no original research, it's broad without being too broad.

Congratulations on the Good Article status! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]