Talk:2023 Canada–India diplomatic row

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Hardeep Singh Nijjar
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Hardeep Singh Nijjar

Canada

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles

India

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

International relations

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles

Page Redirect[edit]

See Talk:Hardeep_Singh_Nijjar#Splitting_proposal

I have redirected 2023 Canada-India diplomatic row to Diplomatic fallout section on the Hardeep Singh Nijjar page.

There have been several discussions (1, 2, 3) about whether this content needs to be split and a new page created to cover the 2023 India Canada diplomatic crisis (or in this instance "row") but I believe consensus still applies given current events are still largely in line with what is already covered.

Alternatively, we can redirect this page to 2023 Diplomatic Crisis section on the Canada - India relations page. Open to this option (now that I'm thinking about it, actually prefer it) but don't think the current content and previous consensus warrant a separate page that would be largely WP:Redundant

@The Kip: @Reywas92: @Lukt64: @Iskandar323: @RogerYg: pinging a few users from the previous redirect discussion in case the thinking has changed since last month.

Schwinnspeed (talk) 13:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. At just four paragraphs, the content wasn't really standalone fodder from the beginning, and was readily absorbed at the destination – its most appropriate home in the first place. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:54, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pirate of the High Seas:, thanks for adding content - definitely stronger than what was there before but I still feel like a separate page is not needed, especially when the content is highly WP:Duplicate with whats on the Hardeep Singh Nijjar page and Canada-India relations page. See previous consensus discussions linked above- not much has changed in the few weeks since this was aligned. Also we're missing all of the context around what started this in the first place (i.e., the death of Nijjar) A redirect to 2023 Diplomatic Crisis feels appropriate given all of the above. Schwinnspeed (talk) 14:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy redirect Propose a WP:SPLIT and/or prepare a WP:DRAFT article that is actually substantive and could stand alone before creating a stub page that duplicates content. Reywas92^Talk 17:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support WP:SPLIT from Hardeep Singh Nijjar page. Support Separate page for this article, because substantial new content has come up since the last discussion. RogerYg (talk) 02:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support a new page - - - This is a developing thing (Diplomatic fallout). I know this thing not going to die down soon. India has also made some allegations on [1] Canada and evidence of allegations may or may not appear, but reconciliation or deterioration of this relationship would really require a standalone page of its own. If we are concerned with duplications, then we can cut the content in both India-Canada relations page and Hardeep Singh Nijjar page so as to redirect readers to this article to get to the details of it. See China–United States trade war.

`~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨ 09:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check same discussion, also being done on Talk:Hardeep Singh Nijjar RogerYg (talk) 08:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up to the participants here, this article was created by Pirate of the High Seas, now confirmed to be the sock of a chronic sockpuppet long disrupting the WP:ARBIPA space. Gotitbro (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok fine. But now it's existence is being supported by non-blocked users. VR _talk 01:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the question, who created this article. No one owns an article on Wikipedia as per WP:OWN. Current discussion and updates matter, many of which support creation of this page. RogerYg (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi . VR _talkPlease check same discussion on Split page , also being done on Talk:Hardeep Singh Nijjar RogerYg (talk) 08:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all editors here, This Split page discussion is also being done on Hardeep Singh Nijjar Talk page.

Talk:Hardeep Singh Nijjar

Please contribute to that discussion. Thanks. RogerYg (talk) 08:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support keeping this as a standalone article as it's subject is notable and passes WP:GNG. No Drug No War (talk) 20:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue. Weigh in at Talk:Hardeep_Singh_Nijjar#Splitting_proposal. VQuakr (talk) 20:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]