Talk:2022 mobilization in the Donetsk People's Republic and the Luhansk People's Republic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 November 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved  — Amakuru (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Mobilization in Donetsk and Luhansk People's RepublicsMobilization in the Donetsk People's Republic and the Luhansk People's Republic – For the WP:CRITERION of WP:PRECISION, because the Donetsk People's Republic is not Donetsk. And WP:CONSISTENCY with:

 —Michael Z. 20:52, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. Super Ψ Dro 18:22, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. More concise. Title is plural "republics", not singular. It is grammatically clear. There is no danger of confusion. Walrasiad (talk) 23:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If plural, then the plural common noun people’s republics oughtn’t be capitalized, as in its exact equivalent people’s republics of Donetsk and Luhansk.  —Michael Z. 23:33, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. No ambiguity concerns, these are just Russian puppet regimes. 罗放 (talk) 16:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I don't particularly like the proposed title because it's too long. However, since my mother tongue is not English, I'd like you to tell me which one of the following two formulations is preferable in terms of precision and grammar: "Mobilization in the People's Republics of Luhansk and Donetsk" or "Mobilization in Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics". Given that "Republics" is plural, I don't see how the latter title (which is also the actual title) can be misunderstood as "Moblization in (the city of) Donetsk and in the Luhansk People's Republics". However, it's possible that "Mobilization in the People's Republics of Luhansk and Donetsk" is equally precise and correct. I understand Michael's point about capitalization but I have no opinion nor preference on that. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mobilization was not forced or men were not threaten to join.[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GksixfgW_Q0 Golftheman (talk) 10:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]