Talk:2019 Northeast Brazil oil spill

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2019 Northeast Brazil oil spill article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A news item involving 2019 Northeast Brazil oil spill was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 29 October 2019.

Wikipedia

Brazil: Geography Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Geography of Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article needs a map to be included.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutral point of view[edit]

¨Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has been seen to respond passively to the disaster, speaking publicly only to pass blame¨ i think this could be considered against the npv in my opinion. Im purposing we change this to a more npv compliant wording. --86.60.247.7 (talk) 11:05, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well idk but we can see if this is nuetral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.223.187.27 (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is sourced to this article which is considered to be from a reliable source. It's possible that the text could be improved to more closely reflect the article, but I think that it's also WP:DUE to cover the people's impression about the suboptimal government response. WP:NPOV is about properly representing reliable sources, not avoiding notable and media-reported criticism. —Paleo Neonate – 06:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]