Talk:Rana Plaza collapse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image OTRS[edit]

The editor claims "permission to use in Wikipedia given by author by email". Can someone verify this? Thanks Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 17:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the photos to commons. I have forwarded the permission email to OTRS. If you want, I can forward it to you or whoever wants to verify this. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 21:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crack or cracks?[edit]

I've read many a source that said that cracks plural were seen in the structure the day before. It seems unlikely that a single crack was all that appeared. Is there a reason I keep getting reverted? Abductive (reasoning) 20:41, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(a) there are many a source that say "a crack", (b) you're doing half a job and changing part of the article but not all of it. Please ensure you make the article consistent if you wish to change the content of it. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dhaka?![edit]

This page should be redirected as 2013 Savar building collapse. Cause the collapse happened in Savar.--Pratyya (Hello!) 10:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

Folks, I have asked people who have visited the location to contribute photos to commons. So far, got a few contributions which I'm adding to commons:Category:2013_in_Bangladesh. Please use them as you see fit in the article. --Ragib (talk) 16:15, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladeshi newspapers[edit]

Here is a list of Bangladeshi newspapers. (See also Category:Newspapers published in Bangladesh.)

—Wavelength (talk) 20:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks Wavelength. Your info is quite helpful. New worl (talk) 18:14, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox suspects[edit]

This is an article about a collapse, according to the title.There is an infobox, and it names suspects. Should I interpret from that context that they are suspected of collapsing the building? --Normash (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A new (sub)heading in the article[edit]

I am thinking about a new (sub)heading in the article about infringements of the Labour Act in Bangladesh. This has some good info for starting point: http://www.thedailystar.net/beta2/news/tragedy-shows-urgency-of-worker-protections-hrw/

What do you think of this idea?

Thanks.

New worl (talk) 08:57, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you can cite a notable claim that any of the deaths were a result of what you mention, then you can maybe try such a subsection. And maybe someone should add related wikipedia articles to the See also section. Do you have any suggestions for such articles? --Normash (talk) 07:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Owner a Criminal[edit]

The owner seems to be involved in very shady deals. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/01/world/asia/bangladesh-garment-industry-reliant-on-flimsy-oversight.html --119.192.173.132 (talk) 15:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thirty international apparel brands[edit]

"Loblaw Inc. CEO Galen Weston said before the company's annual meeting that as many as 30 international apparel brands were having goods manufactured in this building yet only two have come forward to speak publicly." (Loblaw CEO troubled by silence of other retailers - Businessweek, May 02, 2013) I propose that Wikipedia find out the names of all thirty brands and list them in the article. —Wavelength (talk) 01:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Wavelength. It's a great idea. New worl (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
From my Web search for rana plaza list brands, I found these articles, which mention some of the brands.
—Wavelength (talk) 18:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bad effect of globalization[edit]

I just added a bad effect of globalization in this paragraph Economic_inequality#Views_on_globalization. I hope that editors in this talk page will add more perspective to that article. Thanks, New worl (talk) 10:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disadvantages of boycott[edit]

Some articles discuss the disadvantages of a boycott of Bangladeshi products.

—Wavelength (talk) 18:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Final Embrace: The Most Haunting Photograph from Bangladesh[edit]

photo

It's not clear what you're trying to do/say. To me, the photo seems unsuitable to be included in the article, and it's clear enough from the text in the article what a terrible and deadly disaster this was. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could use a photo of the Rana Plaza before the collapse[edit]

In my opinion, this article could use a photo of the Rana Plaza before the collapse. There is one here that should be usable (in low quality and small dimensions, to make it fair use). --82.170.113.123 (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google Maps gives the address of Rana Plaza as follows.
  • "Rana Plaza, Imandipur Road, Savar, Dhaka Division, Bangladesh"
Therefore, an image search for "Imandipur Road" might be helpful.
Pictures just might be available from one or more of these businesses.
—Wavelength (talk) 15:14, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Generator startup[edit]

Supposedly the collapse was triggered by generator(s) starting up when the regular power supply went out. Anybody have a WP:RS on this? Abductive (reasoning) 00:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Main Uddin Khandaker, head of a government inquiry team, said the generators started up after a power cut, sending powerful vibrations throughout the building, which - together with the vibration of thousands of sewing machines - triggered the collapse."[1]; "I was talking to Ruby when the power went out about 20 minutes later. As soon as the gigantic generator was switched on, around 9.03am, there was a sound like a thunder clap and the roof crumbled down on us."[2]; just Google a bit and there are plenty of hits. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 12:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Graphic images[edit]

Do we really need pictures of mangled dead bodies? Can they at least be put in an auto-collapsed gallery? I'm sure there is some WP: article or other explaining how they can be there, and that's fine, but they're just awful and gruesome.

Thanks, --IP98 (talk) 22:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That would be WP:NOTCENSORED - something that gets linked a LOT on Wkp. The images show really terrible things but are relevant to the article. --82.8.226.105 (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing out the exact article. I also agree that the image be included. New worl (talk) 13:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, the image should be removed from the article. As I wrote in another section on this Talk page, it's clear enough from the text in the article what a terrible and deadly disaster this was. There are enough other pictures in the article. Showing dead garment workers adds absolutely nothing. Adding a photo that is described as "The Most Haunting Photograph from Bangladesh" does nothing but add a shock factor. Wikipedia is not censored, but there's a reason a drawing is used at Snowballing (sexual practice) and paintings are shown at Sexual intercourse. If it's not necessary to include content that you know offends certain people, just don't do it. A building collapses, more than a thousand people die and several thousand are injured. It's not necessary to include the photo of the dead garment workers; anyone will understand there were many mangled dead bodies. If you feel the need to see dead people, there are plenty of other website you can visit. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the image cannot be licensed CC BY-SA 2.0, because it was not made by Flickr user "rijans" from whose page it was copied over to Wikipedia. The image was made by Taslima Akhter. Wikipedia editor Rijans007 could've figured that out quite easily. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 19:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Companies doing business there[edit]

I removed DressBarn as it was brought to our attention via email that the company has claimed they had not done business there since 2010. See [3] and [4]. While the reliability of USA Today is not in question, the existence of contradictory information in other reliable sources makes their involvement with the garment providers at the time of the tragedy unclear at best. I understand a lot of companies will try to weasel out of this, but we should be careful under what criteria of verifiability we include them here, since it's a definite PR and image problem. If someone wants to create a list of "Companies formerly doing business in Savar" then DressBarn would fit better there. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:58, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A company claiming they have not done business there is not actually free good evidence, especially if (I don't know if it was the case here) the evidence for the companies products came from evidence from the factory of interviews with workers and other staff. A big problem with 'they don't make our products' is that many companies actually have no idea who makes their products, they don't want to know. They hire company X who hires company Y who hires company Z at least in part. The main company may claim they limit subcontracting, but then order 200k product with a month deadline when they know the company can only make 100k product and/or would know if they bothered to check. Nil Einne (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

>> Our Work in Summary(Lihaas (talk) 16:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Fashion Industry Response[edit]

The lines "Walmart, J.C. Penney and labour activists have been considering an agreement to improve factory safety in Bangladesh for at least two years.[30] In 2011, Walmart rejected reforms that would have had retailers pay more for apparel to help Bangladesh factories improve safety standards.[21][69]" are confusing, as the rest of this section is in chronological order. Perhaps this section needs to be reorganized with some background pre-disaster information up front, then the response after the disaster? LaurenGrace05 (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)LaurenGrace05[reply]

"Causes related to Brands, fast fashion, outsourcing and capitalism" cleaned[edit]

Subsection "Causes related to Brands, fast fashion, outsourcing and capitalism" has been cleaned up and retitled "Causes related to manufacturers and safety compliance." Besides various grammatical and sentence structure issues, the word choice and choice of emphasis struck me as unfocused and ideological. I have mostly reworked the existing material and removed very little in order to give the section a NPOV tone. That said, the sources potentially remain biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolangray (talk • contribs) 23:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Cause and Effect of the 2013 Savar Building Collapse I appreciate the explanation of the cause, especially of how the cause is related due to manufacturers and safety compliances. As well as, how many people were being rescued and the fashion industry responded from it; however, why talk mostly about worldwide criticism?

"The framework requests that those companies make vigorous checks to ensure slave labour is not used in third world countries and the UK to produce their goods.[78]"

It's not considered slavery if it is a job to help others support themselves and their families, even if it is a little amount of money. Yes, there is child labor and poor working conditions that ae being used but it isn't slavery. One way to make a better environment is to produce fair rights to those who worked in garment factories in the fashion industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:5B10:5000:CC3E:A81A:FAD:AE2F (talk) 23:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survivors that committed suicide[edit]

The Wiki article needs to mention the many cases in which survivors of the collapse committed suicide in the months/years following the disaster. The suicides were related something like PTSD, etc.

It is fine to add this if you include a citation to a reliable source. MPS1992 (talk) 07:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2013 Savar building collapse/GA1

EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT[edit]

After reading all the information, this article seems to be super well put together and gives a good spot to just have all the facts in the same spot?

Was there any information on what the collapse did to the environment? I'm sure the building debris and generators becoming waste had to be awful. Thank you!

FHL Oct. 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.93.145 (talk) 02:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013 Savar building collapse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated?[edit]

Certain sections of the article are likely out of date. For instance, I find it highly dubious that the investigation into safety violations is still undergoing after over 7 years. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename page to "Collapse of Rana Plaza"[edit]

It seems to be the far more commonly used term, and is certainely the more recognizable term (I had no clue what the event was based on the title, I always heard and read it as "The Collapse of Rana Plaza"

"Rana Plaza" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rana Plaza and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 2#Rana Plaza until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. BilledMammal (talk) 11:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 April 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 22:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2013 Rana Plaza factory collapse → Rana Plaza collapse – This disaster easily fits WP:NOYEAR because of its four-figure death toll as well as its national & international media coverage. It was a multi-use building that collapsed, not only a factory. Jim Michael 2 (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The benefit would be having a considerably shorter title which doesn't wrongly imply that only a factory collapsed. Jim Michael 2 (talk) 12:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per above. Estar8806 (talk) 22:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support this is a very well-known and documented event. The more succinct title is not ambiguous and as the nomination argues, is more factually correct. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Extra Info[edit]

I have found some information that may be useful in the "Compensation of victims" section. Some amputees were able to be compensated via prosthetic limbs provided by Thailand. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-asia-24338812 Bondsee (talk) 16:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rana_Plaza_collapse&oldid=1220238038"