Talk:2013 International Champions Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Updates[edit]

Can someone update this page please?

You may do it yourself. The article is not locked. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly would you like to have updated? Matches don't start for four more weeks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:31, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brackets system[edit]

This system doesn't make any sense. You must fix the brackets and remove 5th place on ward and keep only the semifinals (both sides). Mussav (talk) 20:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2013 International Champions Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2013 International Champions Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Champions Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bracket misleading[edit]

The 2 losers of "Round 2 – First Round losers" don't automatically play the Seventh place match - it was possible to lose both matches and still come in 3rd in your group: Lose both matches after pens, giving you 2 points and a 0 goal difference. If their opponent lost their first match in regulation (and now the second after pens), they also would have 2 points but a neg. GD, thus being placed last in the group. Similarly how Everton only played for 5th place while LAG played for 3rd. 95.90.223.155 (talk) 17:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne si the champion un Australian edition 2016[edit]

Melbourne won 1-0 at Atlético de Madrid. The champion is Melbourne, not Juventus. The standings say that Juventus played two games, and Melbourne and Atlético de Madrid will play only one. It's not logical! The sponsors and the television broadcast were like all the ICC parties, therefore, it should be considered the same. The fact that the website was not updated with that result, should not change the facts, even that website does not even exist today. --201.183.100.208 (talk) 17:15, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]