Talk:2010 Rose Bowl

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

2010 Rose Bowl[edit]

Re: "The participants in the BCS National Championship Game will partake in simular activities after the completion of the Rose Bowl Game.", You should check a little more carefully. No decisions have been made for the BCS game yet. After the Rose Bowl game? Shouldn't information, if truth, be posted at the BCS game article? The Rose Bowl teams leave town and the BCS teams move into Southern California. Members only site has all the information, including where the training facilities, not the same as the Rose Bowl or the previous years. Interestingly, some how you get such information from the East Coast. Ucla90024 (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Records[edit]

Isn't the record of each team equal "the overall wins-losses (-ties if applicable) of the Visitor (or Home) team playing in the game, prior to the start of the game" as indicated in the template? But some editors keep change the records after the game. Why?? 216.175.107.228 (talk) 02:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite[edit]

In reference to the small edit war over using "by" or "-" in the infobox for the favorite, I stand corrected that the template guide uses "by" as seen at Template:Infobox NCAA football yearly game. In the future, you can simply find that yourself and reference it here on the talk page or at least attempt some sort of dialogue rather than starting an edit war and accusing editors of being the same person when they clearly aren't. I have seen the "-" sign in common usage, however, so it is also acceptable. --JonRidinger (talk) 04:50, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion about this very issue at WT:CFB#Odds, so the usage in the template may be changed. --JonRidinger (talk) 15:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the template for correct use. 99.90.144.184 (talk) 05:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Odds RFC[edit]

Please see the requests for comment on the format of the odds on this discussion page. --slakr^\ talk / 01:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Rose Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218154630/http://www.tournamentofroses.com/press/press/press_2009_teams_announced.html to http://www.tournamentofroses.com/press/press/press_2009_teams_announced.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Rose Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218172130/http://www.tournamentofroses.com/rosebowlgame/game-quick-facts.asp to http://www.tournamentofroses.com/rosebowlgame/game-quick-facts.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]