Talk:2010 Open Championship

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seve Ballesteros[edit]

Seve has announced that he plans to play at St. Andrews so the field section of the article, which states that he is not expected to play, could do with changing. I would do it myself but I don't know which categories he qualifies under. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that he is playing in a special past Champions event prior to the tournament, not the tournament itself —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstevens60 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Price[edit]

I'm not sure why he is not listed as eligible but not expected to play. He won in 1994 and is less than 60. I added him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstevens60 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He didn't enter and the entry deadline has passed. Tewapack (talk) 04:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had way too many "nots" in my first sentence. I knew he wasn't playing. My concern is that he wasn't listed as "eligible but not expected to play". I added him to that list and someone smarter than me activated the link, so all is right in the world now. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dstevens60 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

150 years[edit]

R&A are advertising this is "celebrating 150 years" although this is only the 139th Open. Assume this is because some were missed due to wars and also one way way back because they didn't have a trophy. Could somebody check this out then delete this comment. Thanks, Fuzzy14 80.254.146.4 (talk) 16:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

==Also called the "British Open".

It's a bit presumptuous and Eurocentric to call this "The Open Championship" without so much as a nod to the term used in the U.S. (the British Open).Ryoung122 02:41, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Open Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120418224641/http://www.theopen.com/~/media/The%20Open/Information/Media_Guide.ashx to http://www.theopen.com/~/media/The%20Open/Information/Media_Guide.ashx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]