Talk:2007 AT&T 250

2007 AT&T 250 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 23, 2022.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 19, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed
May 10, 2018	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 30, 2017.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Aric Almirola received credit for winning the 2007 AT&T 250 despite not finishing the race?

Current status: Featured article

NASCAR Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.NASCARWikipedia:WikiProject NASCARTemplate:WikiProject NASCARNASCAR articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

edit
history
watch
purge

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2007 AT&T 250/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will be taking on this review and expect comments will appear soon. MWright96 (talk) 10:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Background[edit]

"It returned to the schedule in 1993 and had been on the schedule every year" - reptition of schedule
"Wimmer, who entered the race with three consecutive top-five finishes and five consecutive top-tens," - same issue as above
"David Reutimann, Regan Smith, Greg Biffle, Marcos Ambrose, Bobby Hamilton Jr., and Jason Leffler rounded out the top ten." - you're missing David Ragan from this sentence.

Practice and qualifying[edit]

It would be helpful to the general reader to have the knowledge what the fastest lap times set by Scott Wimmer were

Race[edit]

The 250-lap race began at 8:00 p.m. EDT, televised live on ESPN2." - The 250-lap race began at 8:00 p.m. EDT, and was televised live in the United States on ESPN2.
These two sources [1] [2] would help to clarify some major points in this sub-section like why Hamlin could not land in the infield and which of Edwards' tire went flat and how that came to be

Post-race comments[edit]

Wikilink ESPN and do the same in the lead

References[edit]

Refs 7 and 20 lead to a 404 page and will need archiving.

Overall quite the well-written article we have here. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 08:05, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Done all. Let me know if there is anything else or if you have an article you would like me to review. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 20:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bcschneider53: There's nothing else that needs rectifying so I can now pass this review. MWright96 (talk) 21:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]