Talk:1967 in film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Can anybody put the dates for the "other films released" paagraph please? Thank you!

Re-releases[edit]

Per Trekphiler's edit here. While Box Office Mojo may opt for "lifetime" grosses in its totals, in this instance the lifetime gross for The Graduate is more or less a first-run gross because it has only ever had a single release, except for a couple of limited anniversary runs. You can see the breakdown at http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=releases&id=graduate.htm which itemises each release. The Jungle Book on the other hand has had several major releases, itemised at http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=releases&id=junglebook.htm. Honestly, I think this chart has a lot of problems and isn't fit for purpose, but the problems are lower down the chart, not with the top two films. Personally I would restore the historical Variety rentals chart (which can be found in the page history) and is a better representation of contemporary success. Betty Logan (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So neither "The Graduate" nor "The Jungle Book", as listed, are the actual annual take, contrary to what you yourself said was the standard for year pages, & to what the reader would expect for a year page. Instead, you demand looking at other links, without specifying the need to do it & without specifying which films do, & don't, need to have special attention. And on top of that, you expect the casual reader to know the difference between "gross" & "rental", or to even realize there is a difference. And you wonder why I'm changing it. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 19:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]