This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This page should not be deleted. I am currently working my way through the Norwegian people category adding birth and death dates into Years in Norway articles. This is ongoing work and means that it will take some time to populate the Years articles fully. Give me a chance to do so please, instead of seeking deletion seconds after putting the Year up. Wikipedia is supposed to be a collaborate effort to devise and improve articles - effort put into that would be better than deleting without understanding. Ardfern (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think speedy deletion is applicable. The article is very short, but there is no lack of context. It is clear what the article deals (and is intended to deal) with. Cycle~ (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the speedy deletion and hangon tags now that I have been given a valid reason for keeping the article. Keep up all the hard work Ardfern. Thanks! L07ChLeo3 (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
