Talk:.sexy

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was redirect.

A fact from .sexy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that you can't be .sexy in private?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/.sexy.

Wikipedia

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 19:12, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that you can't be .sexy in private? Source: "fears about Whois privacy ... Uniregistry wants to know the real identities of all of the registrants in its TLDs, even those who register names using Whois privacy services"
- ALT1:... that toilet paper isn't .sexy? Source: "Schilling argues that the test of how generic, and by extension popular, a gTLD is should be whether toiletpaper.tld works. I think toiletpaper.guru works, but toiletpaper.sexy does not."

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kevin L. Tan

Created by Vaticidalprophet (talk). Self-nominated at 14:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

New enough, long enough, neutral, both hooks cited (first inline, second one is from a quote), Earwig checks out (picks up the quote which is fine). Hooks are pretty funny, so both can be used. QPQ done. This is good to go. Roniius^{talk to me} 16:08, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]