Talk:(26375) 1999 DE₉

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

The french version of this article uses somewhat different data. Martinwilke1980 21:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tancredi2009[edit]

For some reason Tancredi2009 tags this object with # suggesting his diameter estimate is assumed. The Spitzer Space Telescope estimated that it is 461 ± 45 km in diameter. -- Kheider (talk) 20:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarf planet?[edit]

No, it says "Yes?". It doesn't say "???". DN-boards1 (talk) 20:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DN-boards1: No. The only mention is in the table: "(26375) ?" Tancredi puts a question mark on this body. And in this other paper, it remains only a candidate: [1]. Please, what is the problem with recording what the reliable sources state?!? BatteryIncluded (talk) 20:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You keep referring to the "Tancredi" reference. The only Tancredi in this article is: Tancredi, G., & Favre, S. (2008) Which are the dwarfs in the Solar System?. It is ONE page long. It has a table on the second column. The question marks are candidates. There is no "Yes" or "No" list. Do you have another paper by Tancredi that is not mentioned in this article? Your edits are unsupported by this reference, so how can you argue against this? BatteryIncluded (talk) 23:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to a different one, my bad. I refer to this one: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7462648&fileId=S1743921310001717. Page 7.

Sorry about the confusion. DN-boards1 (talk) 23:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]