Talk:White-tailed eagle
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Updated section on population recovery in Europe
[edit]I did some minor changes to the section, mainly clarifying that the eagle did NOT go extinct in all of Central Europe except Poland. In fact, a number of local populations survived throughout eastern, central and northern Europe. This is important, since this is a result of local conservation actions, and since this later proved to have preserved considerable amounts of local genetic diversity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.114.40 (talk) 04:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Updated status
[edit]I updated the status of the White-tailed Eagle in the taxobox as well as in the references. NaturalDisaster
Am I Mistaken?
[edit]Or is that a BALD Eagle in the far right picture at the bottom of the page? It sure looks like one.
- Indeed you are right, the original creator has uploaded it under the correct latin name (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) for Bald Eagle but as a White-tailed Eagle. Emoscopes Talk 00:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know which image you're talking about. I couldn't find the one that shows a bald eagle instead of a white tailed eagle. Did it get replaced with the correct one? EAGLITIZED (talk) 21:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Bald Eagle
[edit]What's the bald eagle got to do with anything. The bald eagle article doesn't mention the white-tailed eagle. 21:52, 11 June 2007 (UTC) (so prominantly) - just noticed it does 172.141.63.119 21:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Crossword Puzzle Answer
[edit]I get bored at work all the time and do the NY Times crossword puzzle... Erne or Ernes is a favorite answer of crossword puzzle creators. It might be a little bit of trivia to throw in the article somewhere. Rigbyl7 02:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Map is wrong
[edit]White-tailed eagle stays all year along the entire Norwegian coast, but are most common from Bergen and northwards. Orcaborealis 18:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Wingspan
[edit]250–300 cm is utter nonsense. Mullarney, Svensson & Zetterström give a range of 190–240 cm, while Ferguson-Lees & Christie have it at 193–244 cm. Never seen more than 250 cm offered in ornithological literature, and even that's a generous approximation. --Anshelm '77 (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Added more info in the Near-extinction and recovery in Europe section...
[edit]Just added some info on the news that two of the fifteen birds introduced to Ireland last year, were found dead in Co. Kerry in February 2008 - allegedly poisoned. KeithHennessy (talk) 17:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Page needed?
[edit]In several places in this article the tag [page needed] is used. I have not seen this before. What does it mean? It is very distracting and detracts from the article. I propose to edit these out unless they are serving some purpose.__DrChrissy (talk) 18:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Haliaeetus albicilla (Svolvær, 2012).jpg to appear as POTD
[edit]Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Haliaeetus albicilla (Svolvær, 2012).jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 18, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-09-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on White-tailed eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070310162650/http://www.staatsbosbeheer.nl:80/actueel/zeearend/default.asp?id={8301F776-F5D0-46A9-8432-99B08D34A3AC} to http://www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/actueel/zeearend/default.asp?id={8301F776-F5D0-46A9-8432-99B08D34A3AC}
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Supernatural bioaccumulation ?
[edit]In the chapter "Causes of decline" we can read "Other pollutants [than DDT] carelessly put into the white-tailed eagles natural environments included heavy metal contaminations which affect them through bioaccumulation. These were recorded in white-tailed eagles, to 6600 mg/g, compared to about 2500 mg/g in peregrine falcons & only 100-280 g in grey partridges (Perdix perdix) and ring-necked pheasants."
How can a concentration be "6600 mg/g" ? That is 6.6 g/g ! BrossàDent (talk) 21:19, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Good catch. The original source is not online (being a 1965 conference report in Swedish), but is cited in another paper.[1] That one does not provide the eagle values but provides the pheasant figure: a mercury concentration of 20000-45000 ng/g (i.e., 0.020-0.045 mg/g). Which confusingly is stated in our article as plain "100-280 g", which is clearly nonsensical, too. Sigh.
- Best guess, the actual figure is meant to be 0.066 mg/g. But without being able to check the source, that's not good enough. I'm removing the entire sentence for the time being. If someone can rustle up the cited source, [2] please give a shout. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:47, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Broo, B.; Odsjö, T. (1981). "Mercury levels in feathers of eagle‐owls Bubo bubo in a captive, a reintroduced and a native wild population in SW Sweden" (PDF). Ecography. 4 (4): 270–277.
- ^ Borg, K. , Wanntorp, H., Erne, K. & Hanko, E. (1965). Kvicksilverförgiftningar bland vilt i Sverige. State Veterinary Medical Institute. Stockholm.
Misuse of "very seldom"
[edit]This:
“ | However, they very seldomly take any healthy specimens and mostly feed on these after death. Of 36 cases of feeding on lambs and kids by white-tailed eagles in Norway, only 12 could be proven to have been taken alive by the eagles.[32][177][178] | ” |
seems incorrectly phrased to me. 12/36 is not seldom, certainly not very seldom. (This isn't a >50%/<50% kind of number. 1/3 is huge.) And even moreso since those were the proven cases, which means there were more. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White-tailed_eagle&diff=1025823271&oldid=1024933587 Invasive Spices (talk) 19:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Ireland not included on the map
[edit]These birds are fairly widespread on the coasts of the island of Ireland, but the map doesn't include Ireland in their habitat. I think this should be corrected?
Is map wrong ??
[edit]I do not find it logical that the breeding areas of migratory birds are in North Asia, aren't some birds supposed to be residing for a year..? I mean the Area is very large for nesting only...
Haliaeetus albicilla distribution map.png عثمان التطواني (talk) 01:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Unknown rationale for when citations are placed in "Cited works"
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians, This article uses shortened footnotes multiple times but with a rationale that is difficult to understand. Anyone who can describe the rationale for which citations are included in the Cited works section, please comment below. This information would be helpful because Wikipedia's Citing sources guidelines recommend that articles have a single citation style applied consistently, but editors cannot re-establish consistency if the style is unknown. When it is clear what the intended style for footnotes is, a notice on the talk page stating the intended style will assist editors seeking to maintain high standards for Wikipedia's citations. For examples of such style notices, see {{Note short footnote style 1 in use}} or {{Note short footnote style 2 in use}}. |
Any responses would be appreciated. J JMesserly (talk) 08:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Whitetail confusion.
[edit]When I read the article on white-tailed-sea-eagles, it said the ones in western Eurasia are paler, and the ones in eastern Eurasia are richer brown. In an encyclopedia, it features several photos of these beautiful birds in Hokkaido, Japan, except they're pale and scruffy looking like the ones more east. I'm confused! P.S, even though I said "scruffy looking", I like the plumage of western ones more than eastern ones. :p EAGLITIZED (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- B-Class bird articles
- Mid-importance bird articles
- WikiProject Birds articles
- B-Class Europe articles
- Unknown-importance Europe articles
- WikiProject Europe articles
- B-Class Asia articles
- Unknown-importance Asia articles
- WikiProject Asia articles
- B-Class Russia articles
- Unknown-importance Russia articles
- Unknown-importance B-Class Russia articles
- WikiProject Russia articles with no associated task force
- WikiProject Russia articles
- B-Class Greenland articles
- Unknown-importance Greenland articles
- WikiProject Greenland articles