Talk:Tory Lane

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tory Lane article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Pornography Mid‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 December 2014. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 July 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Additional photos

There are an additional two free-licensed photographs of this actress at Image:Tory Lane, LA party 1.JPG and Image:Tory Lane, LA party 2.JPG. If any feel they'd serve as a main image better than the current choice, feel free to replace. They're just there in case of a sudden expansion of the article. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 14:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IAFD

@Guy1890, re: [1], Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography#Reliable_for_filmographies.2C_not_biographies lists IAFD as unreliable for biographic data czar 04:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't actually say that at all. What it does say is that IAFD "Sometimes has a better biography, usually has a better film list. ... Their filmographies are considered reliable, but opinion is split on whether their biographical information is reliable." IAFD has been used in Wikipedia articles like this one countless numbers of times for basic biographic data and reliable adult filmography information. Guy1890 (talk) 07:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Their filmographies are considered reliable, but opinion is split on whether their biographical information is reliable." If there is consensus that the site is reliable for biographic data (fact-checking process, reputation for editorial quality, etc.), then it's time to change that sentence. If there is no consensus, then it is not a reliable source. czar 14:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tory Lane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=23199
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051013091855/http://playboy.com/playboytv/original_series/americansexstar/ to http://www.playboy.com/playboytv/original_series/americansexstar/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]