Talk:Miho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split (2023)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to split. History6042 (talk) 19:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is more than a simple name list, it contains substantive material about the Japanese name, but also a namelist for the Croatian name. This would be conflating two different topics, a Japanese female name and a Croatian male name. They should be treated in separate articles. "Miho" would become a disambiguation page, converting part of the see-also section in the disambiguation content, along with some remaining in see-also, and the two new name articles as disambiguation content. -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 21:56, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, seems clear that the Japanese name is the primary topic at least for now. I think the Croatian name should be split to its own article with a hatnote on this one and this makes it clearer that it's the Japanese name. Canterbury Tail talk 22:16, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would support a split.★Trekker (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. It currently talks about two different subjects ("Miho" as a name of Japanese origin, and "Miho" as a name of Croatian origin), and even when their transliteration is the same, they seem to have originated independently and separatedly. --Onwa (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I like the cut of your jib. holly {chat} 17:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.